Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Section 138 requires cheques to be presented within six months from the date drawn or within validity; undated cheques delivered on the loan date are reckoned from that date, and presentation after that period invalidates Section 138 relief. Separately, guarantor liability under the Master Facility Agreement and Deed of Guarantee arises only after contractually defined events of default and prescribed pre-conditions (including notice/demand) are complied with. Where the record shows ongoing payments, a subsisting restructured account, and no crystallised default or contractual demand, invoking security cheques or Section 138 proceedings amounts to an abuse of process and is impermissible.
Section 138 requires cheques to be presented within six months from the date drawn or within validity; undated cheques delivered on the loan date are reckoned from that date, and presentation after that period invalidates Section 138 relief. Separately, guarantor liability under the Master Facility Agreement and Deed of Guarantee arises only after contractually defined events of default and prescribed pre-conditions (including notice/demand) are complied with. Where the record shows ongoing payments, a subsisting restructured account, and no crystallised default or contractual demand, invoking security cheques or Section 138 proceedings amounts to an abuse of process and is impermissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.