Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
On certiorari review of an order under Section 74 concerning alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit by misstatement and suppression, the court found that reasons were recorded and relevant factors considered and therefore declined to interfere absent any shown perversity or mala fides; the petitioner's request to waive or reduce the statutory pre deposit for filing a statutory appeal was refused for lack of extraordinary circumstances; the writ petition challenging the Section 74 order was dismissed, and the court's observations were treated as tentative and without prejudice to any appeal on merits.
On certiorari review of an order under Section 74 concerning alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit by misstatement and suppression, the court found that reasons were recorded and relevant factors considered and therefore declined to interfere absent any shown perversity or mala fides; the petitioner's request to waive or reduce the statutory pre deposit for filing a statutory appeal was refused for lack of extraordinary circumstances; the writ petition challenging the Section 74 order was dismissed, and the court's observations were treated as tentative and without prejudice to any appeal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
