Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires a prior, specific proposal for retrospective effect in the show-cause notice and disclosure of the reasons/materials relied upon; absence of such proposal renders retrospective effect unsustainable. Authorities must supply any supportive documents referred to in the notice before final adjudication; failure to supply vitiates proceedings. Cancellation orders must be reasoned and not cryptic; non-speaking orders demonstrate non-application of mind and are unsustainable. Procedural defects of these kinds may justify exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction despite alternate remedies. Orders quashed with liberty to reopen proceedings after fresh notice, supply of materials and a reasoned hearing.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires a prior, specific proposal for retrospective effect in the show-cause notice and disclosure of the reasons/materials relied upon; absence of such proposal renders retrospective effect unsustainable. Authorities must supply any supportive documents referred to in the notice before final adjudication; failure to supply vitiates proceedings. Cancellation orders must be reasoned and not cryptic; non-speaking orders demonstrate non-application of mind and are unsustainable. Procedural defects of these kinds may justify exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction despite alternate remedies. Orders quashed with liberty to reopen proceedings after fresh notice, supply of materials and a reasoned hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
