Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires a prior, specific proposal for retrospective effect in the show-cause notice and disclosure of the reasons/materials relied upon; absence of such proposal renders retrospective effect unsustainable. Authorities must supply any supportive documents referred to in the notice before final adjudication; failure to supply vitiates proceedings. Cancellation orders must be reasoned and not cryptic; non-speaking orders demonstrate non-application of mind and are unsustainable. Procedural defects of these kinds may justify exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction despite alternate remedies. Orders quashed with liberty to reopen proceedings after fresh notice, supply of materials and a reasoned hearing.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires a prior, specific proposal for retrospective effect in the show-cause notice and disclosure of the reasons/materials relied upon; absence of such proposal renders retrospective effect unsustainable. Authorities must supply any supportive documents referred to in the notice before final adjudication; failure to supply vitiates proceedings. Cancellation orders must be reasoned and not cryptic; non-speaking orders demonstrate non-application of mind and are unsustainable. Procedural defects of these kinds may justify exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction despite alternate remedies. Orders quashed with liberty to reopen proceedings after fresh notice, supply of materials and a reasoned hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
