Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Remand by a tribunal to the Transfer Pricing Officer is legally distinct from a reference initiated by the Assessing Officer; therefore the time-limit for giving effect to a tribunal remand is governed by the statutory provision applicable to fresh orders on appellate remand (the provision corresponding to Section 153(3) and the related giving-effect provision) and not by the extension mechanism that applies only to AO references. Applying the jurisdictional nature of limitation, the court found the period to give effect had expired on 31-03-2024, quashed the communication rejecting refund and directed payment of the excess tax with interest and timelines for compliance.
Remand by a tribunal to the Transfer Pricing Officer is legally distinct from a reference initiated by the Assessing Officer; therefore the time-limit for giving effect to a tribunal remand is governed by the statutory provision applicable to fresh orders on appellate remand (the provision corresponding to Section 153(3) and the related giving-effect provision) and not by the extension mechanism that applies only to AO references. Applying the jurisdictional nature of limitation, the court found the period to give effect had expired on 31-03-2024, quashed the communication rejecting refund and directed payment of the excess tax with interest and timelines for compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
