Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6801 to 6820 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Remand by a tribunal to the Transfer Pricing Officer is legally distinct from a reference initiated by the Assessing Officer; therefore the time-limit for giving effect to a tribunal remand is governed by the statutory provision applicable to fresh orders on appellate remand (the provision corresponding to Section 153(3) and the related giving-effect provision) and not by the extension mechanism that applies only to AO references. Applying the jurisdictional nature of limitation, the court found the period to give effect had expired on 31-03-2024, quashed the communication rejecting refund and directed payment of the excess tax with interest and timelines for compliance.
Remand by a tribunal to the Transfer Pricing Officer is legally distinct from a reference initiated by the Assessing Officer; therefore the time-limit for giving effect to a tribunal remand is governed by the statutory provision applicable to fresh orders on appellate remand (the provision corresponding to Section 153(3) and the related giving-effect provision) and not by the extension mechanism that applies only to AO references. Applying the jurisdictional nature of limitation, the court found the period to give effect had expired on 31-03-2024, quashed the communication rejecting refund and directed payment of the excess tax with interest and timelines for compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
