Business deductions and transfer pricing issues: tribunal treatment of software write-offs, donation receipts, warranty provisions, and related expens...
Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Remand by a tribunal to the Transfer Pricing Officer is legally distinct from a reference initiated by the Assessing Officer; therefore the time-limit for giving effect to a tribunal remand is governed by the statutory provision applicable to fresh orders on appellate remand (the provision corresponding to Section 153(3) and the related giving-effect provision) and not by the extension mechanism that applies only to AO references. Applying the jurisdictional nature of limitation, the court found the period to give effect had expired on 31-03-2024, quashed the communication rejecting refund and directed payment of the excess tax with interest and timelines for compliance.
Remand by a tribunal to the Transfer Pricing Officer is legally distinct from a reference initiated by the Assessing Officer; therefore the time-limit for giving effect to a tribunal remand is governed by the statutory provision applicable to fresh orders on appellate remand (the provision corresponding to Section 153(3) and the related giving-effect provision) and not by the extension mechanism that applies only to AO references. Applying the jurisdictional nature of limitation, the court found the period to give effect had expired on 31-03-2024, quashed the communication rejecting refund and directed payment of the excess tax with interest and timelines for compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
