Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Presumption as to ownership of seized material does not permit altering recorded figures in seized documents without independent corroboration; speculative reconstruction of numeric entries (adding two zeros) is inadmissible and additions under unexplained investment and consequential interest founded solely on that hypothesis are deleted. Entries on loose sheets described as estimates likewise lack corroboration and cannot support additions, and a retracted statement under seizure has no standalone evidentiary value. Result: deletions of additions based on speculative diary alteration and uncorroborated loose-sheet entries; ownership of the diary acknowledged but cannot substitute for independent proof.
Presumption as to ownership of seized material does not permit altering recorded figures in seized documents without independent corroboration; speculative reconstruction of numeric entries (adding two zeros) is inadmissible and additions under unexplained investment and consequential interest founded solely on that hypothesis are deleted. Entries on loose sheets described as estimates likewise lack corroboration and cannot support additions, and a retracted statement under seizure has no standalone evidentiary value. Result: deletions of additions based on speculative diary alteration and uncorroborated loose-sheet entries; ownership of the diary acknowledged but cannot substitute for independent proof.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
