Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Page of 4921
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98411 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.