Cash routed to non-existent firm deemed proceeds of crime; laundered funds and properties attachable, provisional attachments confirmed; two accounts ...
Continuation of Section 73 service-tax proceedings after provider's death (construing s.65(7)) - held to abate; posthumous OIO and recoveries invalida...
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
