Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
