Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
