Disallowance under tax law for investment expenses cannot be applied mechanically; authority must record clear reasons before increasing assessee's su...
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Omission of specific wording in Form No.10 does not automatically defeat accumulation under section 11(2) where the assessee substantiates the specific purpose and the tax officer was aware of and did not disbelieve the declaration; accumulation must, however, remain within the trust's objects, and supporting documents (object clauses, board resolution, project details) may cure a vague Form 10 description. Tribunal directed fresh consideration of the deduction claimed under section 11(2) for the relevant year in light of the materials furnished and precedents favouring substance over formal vagueness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.