Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Protective additions made in the society's assessment were held unsustainable because substantially identical diary entries were treated in substantive assessments of the individuals; the adjudicating body applied the peak-credit approach to allocate amounts to each individual and set those amounts off against income they had declared in the survey year. Given that surrendered income was credited to avoid double taxation, the protective addition in the society's hands was deleted on the ground that the same receipts cannot be taxed twice.
Protective additions made in the society's assessment were held unsustainable because substantially identical diary entries were treated in substantive assessments of the individuals; the adjudicating body applied the peak-credit approach to allocate amounts to each individual and set those amounts off against income they had declared in the survey year. Given that surrendered income was credited to avoid double taxation, the protective addition in the society's hands was deleted on the ground that the same receipts cannot be taxed twice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.