Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Protective additions made in the society's assessment were held unsustainable because substantially identical diary entries were treated in substantive assessments of the individuals; the adjudicating body applied the peak-credit approach to allocate amounts to each individual and set those amounts off against income they had declared in the survey year. Given that surrendered income was credited to avoid double taxation, the protective addition in the society's hands was deleted on the ground that the same receipts cannot be taxed twice.
Protective additions made in the society's assessment were held unsustainable because substantially identical diary entries were treated in substantive assessments of the individuals; the adjudicating body applied the peak-credit approach to allocate amounts to each individual and set those amounts off against income they had declared in the survey year. Given that surrendered income was credited to avoid double taxation, the protective addition in the society's hands was deleted on the ground that the same receipts cannot be taxed twice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.