Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Anti dumping duty cannot be levied on imports made during the interregnum between lapse of provisional measures and issuance of a final notification: the Tribunal applied the Supreme Court ratio in G.M. Exports to hold Rule 20(2)(a) cannot extend provisional duty beyond mandatory time limits and retrospective levy for the gap period is impermissible; imports on 04.06.2011 thus were not liable. Delay in finalisation did not vitiate assessment because no statutory time bar or consequences existed then. The Tribunal also held regular benches retain jurisdiction over assessment and legal issues under the statutory scheme.
Anti dumping duty cannot be levied on imports made during the interregnum between lapse of provisional measures and issuance of a final notification: the Tribunal applied the Supreme Court ratio in G.M. Exports to hold Rule 20(2)(a) cannot extend provisional duty beyond mandatory time limits and retrospective levy for the gap period is impermissible; imports on 04.06.2011 thus were not liable. Delay in finalisation did not vitiate assessment because no statutory time bar or consequences existed then. The Tribunal also held regular benches retain jurisdiction over assessment and legal issues under the statutory scheme.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
