Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Anti dumping duty cannot be levied on imports made during the interregnum between lapse of provisional measures and issuance of a final notification: the Tribunal applied the Supreme Court ratio in G.M. Exports to hold Rule 20(2)(a) cannot extend provisional duty beyond mandatory time limits and retrospective levy for the gap period is impermissible; imports on 04.06.2011 thus were not liable. Delay in finalisation did not vitiate assessment because no statutory time bar or consequences existed then. The Tribunal also held regular benches retain jurisdiction over assessment and legal issues under the statutory scheme.
Anti dumping duty cannot be levied on imports made during the interregnum between lapse of provisional measures and issuance of a final notification: the Tribunal applied the Supreme Court ratio in G.M. Exports to hold Rule 20(2)(a) cannot extend provisional duty beyond mandatory time limits and retrospective levy for the gap period is impermissible; imports on 04.06.2011 thus were not liable. Delay in finalisation did not vitiate assessment because no statutory time bar or consequences existed then. The Tribunal also held regular benches retain jurisdiction over assessment and legal issues under the statutory scheme.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
