Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3101 to 3120 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Requirement that final tax demand be confined to the amount proposed in the show cause notice under Section 75(7) is reiterated; where an adjudication confirms a demand exceeding the notice the order is contrary to the statutory limitation and must be set aside. The court remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, directed the taxpayer to file a reply treating the impugned order as an addendum within thirty days, and ordered the tax authority to pass a fresh final order expeditiously, with recovery measures available if the taxpayer fails to comply after due notice.
Requirement that final tax demand be confined to the amount proposed in the show cause notice under Section 75(7) is reiterated; where an adjudication confirms a demand exceeding the notice the order is contrary to the statutory limitation and must be set aside. The court remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, directed the taxpayer to file a reply treating the impugned order as an addendum within thirty days, and ordered the tax authority to pass a fresh final order expeditiously, with recovery measures available if the taxpayer fails to comply after due notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
