Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6601 to 6620 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash an order in original concerning classification and valuation of imported goods where joint inspection found complete spoilage; the court declined to decide classification or valuation given futility and small consignor interest, setting aside the original order. Respondents authorised to auction or destroy the deteriorated goods and appropriate proceeds to meet liabilities; any surplus after warehousing or similar charges to be returned to the importer. Respondents directed to issue a demurrage waiver certificate for the subject consignment, and the petition disposed accordingly without costs.
Exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash an order in original concerning classification and valuation of imported goods where joint inspection found complete spoilage; the court declined to decide classification or valuation given futility and small consignor interest, setting aside the original order. Respondents authorised to auction or destroy the deteriorated goods and appropriate proceeds to meet liabilities; any surplus after warehousing or similar charges to be returned to the importer. Respondents directed to issue a demurrage waiver certificate for the subject consignment, and the petition disposed accordingly without costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.