Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Rejection of declared transaction value for imported consumer goods was held unjustified where purported original invoices were unsigned Xerox copies that did not match product descriptions or quantities and where there was no corroborative payment or bank transfer evidence; reliance on recovered documents without matching quantities/descriptions or payment corroboration cannot displace declared CIF values, and the redetermination of assessable value based on such documents was unsustainable, resulting in the set aside of the enhancement and consequential demand.
Rejection of declared transaction value for imported consumer goods was held unjustified where purported original invoices were unsigned Xerox copies that did not match product descriptions or quantities and where there was no corroborative payment or bank transfer evidence; reliance on recovered documents without matching quantities/descriptions or payment corroboration cannot displace declared CIF values, and the redetermination of assessable value based on such documents was unsustainable, resulting in the set aside of the enhancement and consequential demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.