Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Admission of a Section 7 petition was upheld where financial debt and default were established by undisputed records and acknowledgements, so admission at the summary stage was proper. The adjudicating authority's role at admission is confined to existence of debt and default; Vidarbha-type viability inquiries were not warranted absent concrete contemporaneous evidence extinguishing the debt. A prior dismissal based on a quashed regulatory circular did not attract res judicata to bar the fresh petition under the revised RBI framework. The RBI framework did not prohibit filing and lender resolution choices are commercial; allegations of creditor misconduct were unproven and did not negate debt or default.
Admission of a Section 7 petition was upheld where financial debt and default were established by undisputed records and acknowledgements, so admission at the summary stage was proper. The adjudicating authority's role at admission is confined to existence of debt and default; Vidarbha-type viability inquiries were not warranted absent concrete contemporaneous evidence extinguishing the debt. A prior dismissal based on a quashed regulatory circular did not attract res judicata to bar the fresh petition under the revised RBI framework. The RBI framework did not prohibit filing and lender resolution choices are commercial; allegations of creditor misconduct were unproven and did not negate debt or default.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.