Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Condonation of delay was granted where the majority of the 822 day delay fell within the pandemic period excluded by Supreme Court guidance on extension of limitation; the High Court, exercising writ jurisdiction, found no deliberate or culpable indolence and took a pragmatic, lenient view to set aside tribunal orders refusing condonation. The court emphasised that the appellate authority has competence under the appeals regime to examine material and merits when considering condonation and directed that the appeal be restored, with a fresh adjudication allowing the petitioner a personal hearing and one opportunity to adduce evidence for claimed charitable exemption.
Condonation of delay was granted where the majority of the 822 day delay fell within the pandemic period excluded by Supreme Court guidance on extension of limitation; the High Court, exercising writ jurisdiction, found no deliberate or culpable indolence and took a pragmatic, lenient view to set aside tribunal orders refusing condonation. The court emphasised that the appellate authority has competence under the appeals regime to examine material and merits when considering condonation and directed that the appeal be restored, with a fresh adjudication allowing the petitioner a personal hearing and one opportunity to adduce evidence for claimed charitable exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
