Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
The NCLAT held that an 'undertaking' means a going concern-an organised revenue generating business integrated with assets-and not an isolated asset; the 20% quantitative test in the Explanation applies only after a qualitative finding of undertaking, so sale of the Saakar Bungalow (a passive mortgaged property acquired in 2017) was an asset sale that did not require a special resolution. The Tribunal upheld that the purchaser was a bona fide purchaser under the circumstances of a SARFAESI distress sale and that alleged undervaluation, with valuation on an 'as is where is' basis, did not warrant appellate interference in the NCLT's exercise of discretion.
The NCLAT held that an 'undertaking' means a going concern-an organised revenue generating business integrated with assets-and not an isolated asset; the 20% quantitative test in the Explanation applies only after a qualitative finding of undertaking, so sale of the Saakar Bungalow (a passive mortgaged property acquired in 2017) was an asset sale that did not require a special resolution. The Tribunal upheld that the purchaser was a bona fide purchaser under the circumstances of a SARFAESI distress sale and that alleged undervaluation, with valuation on an 'as is where is' basis, did not warrant appellate interference in the NCLT's exercise of discretion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
