Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT held that an 'undertaking' means a going concern-an organised revenue generating business integrated with assets-and not an isolated asset; the 20% quantitative test in the Explanation applies only after a qualitative finding of undertaking, so sale of the Saakar Bungalow (a passive mortgaged property acquired in 2017) was an asset sale that did not require a special resolution. The Tribunal upheld that the purchaser was a bona fide purchaser under the circumstances of a SARFAESI distress sale and that alleged undervaluation, with valuation on an 'as is where is' basis, did not warrant appellate interference in the NCLT's exercise of discretion.
The NCLAT held that an 'undertaking' means a going concern-an organised revenue generating business integrated with assets-and not an isolated asset; the 20% quantitative test in the Explanation applies only after a qualitative finding of undertaking, so sale of the Saakar Bungalow (a passive mortgaged property acquired in 2017) was an asset sale that did not require a special resolution. The Tribunal upheld that the purchaser was a bona fide purchaser under the circumstances of a SARFAESI distress sale and that alleged undervaluation, with valuation on an 'as is where is' basis, did not warrant appellate interference in the NCLT's exercise of discretion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
