Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Pre-existing contractual disputes embedded in prior settlement instruments and allocation agreements required contractual interpretation and quantification of liabilities, therefore they constituted a bona fide pre-existing dispute under the insolvency code and barred admission of a Section 9 petition; the tribunal affirmed the adjudicating authority's refusal to commence CIRP and noted estoppel and absence of a spurious defence, allowing the operational creditor to pursue remedies before appropriate fora.
Pre-existing contractual disputes embedded in prior settlement instruments and allocation agreements required contractual interpretation and quantification of liabilities, therefore they constituted a bona fide pre-existing dispute under the insolvency code and barred admission of a Section 9 petition; the tribunal affirmed the adjudicating authority's refusal to commence CIRP and noted estoppel and absence of a spurious defence, allowing the operational creditor to pursue remedies before appropriate fora.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.