Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Pre-existing contractual disputes embedded in prior settlement instruments and allocation agreements required contractual interpretation and quantification of liabilities, therefore they constituted a bona fide pre-existing dispute under the insolvency code and barred admission of a Section 9 petition; the tribunal affirmed the adjudicating authority's refusal to commence CIRP and noted estoppel and absence of a spurious defence, allowing the operational creditor to pursue remedies before appropriate fora.
Pre-existing contractual disputes embedded in prior settlement instruments and allocation agreements required contractual interpretation and quantification of liabilities, therefore they constituted a bona fide pre-existing dispute under the insolvency code and barred admission of a Section 9 petition; the tribunal affirmed the adjudicating authority's refusal to commence CIRP and noted estoppel and absence of a spurious defence, allowing the operational creditor to pursue remedies before appropriate fora.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
