Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Pre-existing contractual disputes embedded in prior settlement instruments and allocation agreements required contractual interpretation and quantification of liabilities, therefore they constituted a bona fide pre-existing dispute under the insolvency code and barred admission of a Section 9 petition; the tribunal affirmed the adjudicating authority's refusal to commence CIRP and noted estoppel and absence of a spurious defence, allowing the operational creditor to pursue remedies before appropriate fora.
Pre-existing contractual disputes embedded in prior settlement instruments and allocation agreements required contractual interpretation and quantification of liabilities, therefore they constituted a bona fide pre-existing dispute under the insolvency code and barred admission of a Section 9 petition; the tribunal affirmed the adjudicating authority's refusal to commence CIRP and noted estoppel and absence of a spurious defence, allowing the operational creditor to pursue remedies before appropriate fora.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.