Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration...
Prohibited importation of cosmetics without prior regulatory registration attracts seizure and confiscation; warehousing or re export claims do not cure noncompliance.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration under the drugs and cosmetics regulatory regime is a prohibited illegal import under the Customs code, attracting seizure and confiscation powers; the court applied the statutory interplay between the Customs and Drugs and Cosmetics enactments to hold such consignments liable to seizure under seizure provisions and confiscation under confiscation provisions. The warehousing scheme and claimed intention to re export do not legalise import of prohibited goods; warehousing relief for re export applies only to goods lawfully imported, and cannot cure absence of prior regulatory licence.
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration under the drugs and cosmetics regulatory regime is a prohibited illegal import under the Customs code, attracting seizure and confiscation powers; the court applied the statutory interplay between the Customs and Drugs and Cosmetics enactments to hold such consignments liable to seizure under seizure provisions and confiscation under confiscation provisions. The warehousing scheme and claimed intention to re export do not legalise import of prohibited goods; warehousing relief for re export applies only to goods lawfully imported, and cannot cure absence of prior regulatory licence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.