NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration...
Prohibited importation of cosmetics without prior regulatory registration attracts seizure and confiscation; warehousing or re export claims do not cure noncompliance.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration under the drugs and cosmetics regulatory regime is a prohibited illegal import under the Customs code, attracting seizure and confiscation powers; the court applied the statutory interplay between the Customs and Drugs and Cosmetics enactments to hold such consignments liable to seizure under seizure provisions and confiscation under confiscation provisions. The warehousing scheme and claimed intention to re export do not legalise import of prohibited goods; warehousing relief for re export applies only to goods lawfully imported, and cannot cure absence of prior regulatory licence.
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration under the drugs and cosmetics regulatory regime is a prohibited illegal import under the Customs code, attracting seizure and confiscation powers; the court applied the statutory interplay between the Customs and Drugs and Cosmetics enactments to hold such consignments liable to seizure under seizure provisions and confiscation under confiscation provisions. The warehousing scheme and claimed intention to re export do not legalise import of prohibited goods; warehousing relief for re export applies only to goods lawfully imported, and cannot cure absence of prior regulatory licence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.