Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6261 to 6280 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration...
Prohibited importation of cosmetics without prior regulatory registration attracts seizure and confiscation; warehousing or re export claims do not cure noncompliance.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration under the drugs and cosmetics regulatory regime is a prohibited illegal import under the Customs code, attracting seizure and confiscation powers; the court applied the statutory interplay between the Customs and Drugs and Cosmetics enactments to hold such consignments liable to seizure under seizure provisions and confiscation under confiscation provisions. The warehousing scheme and claimed intention to re export do not legalise import of prohibited goods; warehousing relief for re export applies only to goods lawfully imported, and cannot cure absence of prior regulatory licence.
Importation of cosmetics without mandatory prior registration under the drugs and cosmetics regulatory regime is a prohibited illegal import under the Customs code, attracting seizure and confiscation powers; the court applied the statutory interplay between the Customs and Drugs and Cosmetics enactments to hold such consignments liable to seizure under seizure provisions and confiscation under confiscation provisions. The warehousing scheme and claimed intention to re export do not legalise import of prohibited goods; warehousing relief for re export applies only to goods lawfully imported, and cannot cure absence of prior regulatory licence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.