Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Interim relief seeking return of re quantified proceeds was refused because an interlocutory order cannot grant final relief and releasing the funds would risk dissipation that could render the respondent's cross appeal infructuous; the reduced quantification did not map to identifiable discrete assets, creating prima facie irreparable prejudice, so the interim application was dismissed while preserving substantive rights in the main appeal. To avoid multiplicity and balance equities, all appeals arising from the adjudicatory order are to be consolidated and heard expeditiously with prescribed pleading timelines and case management steps.
Interim relief seeking return of re quantified proceeds was refused because an interlocutory order cannot grant final relief and releasing the funds would risk dissipation that could render the respondent's cross appeal infructuous; the reduced quantification did not map to identifiable discrete assets, creating prima facie irreparable prejudice, so the interim application was dismissed while preserving substantive rights in the main appeal. To avoid multiplicity and balance equities, all appeals arising from the adjudicatory order are to be consolidated and heard expeditiously with prescribed pleading timelines and case management steps.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
