Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Interim relief seeking return of re quantified proceeds was refused because an interlocutory order cannot grant final relief and releasing the funds would risk dissipation that could render the respondent's cross appeal infructuous; the reduced quantification did not map to identifiable discrete assets, creating prima facie irreparable prejudice, so the interim application was dismissed while preserving substantive rights in the main appeal. To avoid multiplicity and balance equities, all appeals arising from the adjudicatory order are to be consolidated and heard expeditiously with prescribed pleading timelines and case management steps.
Interim relief seeking return of re quantified proceeds was refused because an interlocutory order cannot grant final relief and releasing the funds would risk dissipation that could render the respondent's cross appeal infructuous; the reduced quantification did not map to identifiable discrete assets, creating prima facie irreparable prejudice, so the interim application was dismissed while preserving substantive rights in the main appeal. To avoid multiplicity and balance equities, all appeals arising from the adjudicatory order are to be consolidated and heard expeditiously with prescribed pleading timelines and case management steps.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
