Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
Interim relief seeking return of re quantified proceeds was refused because an interlocutory order cannot grant final relief and releasing the funds would risk dissipation that could render the respondent's cross appeal infructuous; the reduced quantification did not map to identifiable discrete assets, creating prima facie irreparable prejudice, so the interim application was dismissed while preserving substantive rights in the main appeal. To avoid multiplicity and balance equities, all appeals arising from the adjudicatory order are to be consolidated and heard expeditiously with prescribed pleading timelines and case management steps.
Interim relief seeking return of re quantified proceeds was refused because an interlocutory order cannot grant final relief and releasing the funds would risk dissipation that could render the respondent's cross appeal infructuous; the reduced quantification did not map to identifiable discrete assets, creating prima facie irreparable prejudice, so the interim application was dismissed while preserving substantive rights in the main appeal. To avoid multiplicity and balance equities, all appeals arising from the adjudicatory order are to be consolidated and heard expeditiously with prescribed pleading timelines and case management steps.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
