Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where GST registration was cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns, the proviso to Rule 22(4) permits restoration if the person files all pending returns and makes full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee; upon such compliance the proper officer may drop cancellation proceedings and pass the restoration order in Form GST REG-20. The petitioner was directed to apply to the concerned CGST authority for restoration and to comply with the proviso; the authority must consider and decide the application in accordance with law within the timeframe fixed by the court.
Where GST registration was cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns, the proviso to Rule 22(4) permits restoration if the person files all pending returns and makes full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee; upon such compliance the proper officer may drop cancellation proceedings and pass the restoration order in Form GST REG-20. The petitioner was directed to apply to the concerned CGST authority for restoration and to comply with the proviso; the authority must consider and decide the application in accordance with law within the timeframe fixed by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.