Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where GST registration was cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns, the proviso to Rule 22(4) permits restoration if the person files all pending returns and makes full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee; upon such compliance the proper officer may drop cancellation proceedings and pass the restoration order in Form GST REG-20. The petitioner was directed to apply to the concerned CGST authority for restoration and to comply with the proviso; the authority must consider and decide the application in accordance with law within the timeframe fixed by the court.
Where GST registration was cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns, the proviso to Rule 22(4) permits restoration if the person files all pending returns and makes full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee; upon such compliance the proper officer may drop cancellation proceedings and pass the restoration order in Form GST REG-20. The petitioner was directed to apply to the concerned CGST authority for restoration and to comply with the proviso; the authority must consider and decide the application in accordance with law within the timeframe fixed by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.