Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires a specific proposal in the show cause notice and disclosure of the material relied upon; absence of any proposal for retrospective effect in the notice vitiates such cancellation and the order must be set aside. Where reliance is placed on supporting documents or verification reports, those documents must be supplied so the person affected can meet the case; failure to supply them renders cancellation unsustainable. Any fresh order must be a reasoned, speaking order demonstrating application of mind and must follow service of proper notice, disclosure of materials and an opportunity to be heard.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires a specific proposal in the show cause notice and disclosure of the material relied upon; absence of any proposal for retrospective effect in the notice vitiates such cancellation and the order must be set aside. Where reliance is placed on supporting documents or verification reports, those documents must be supplied so the person affected can meet the case; failure to supply them renders cancellation unsustainable. Any fresh order must be a reasoned, speaking order demonstrating application of mind and must follow service of proper notice, disclosure of materials and an opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.