Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Treatment of a negative cash balance as income from unexplained sources was upheld because the taxpayer failed to prove that alleged cash gifts had a verifiable donor source. The court applied the principle that cash gifts require independent evidence of the donor's capacity and source of funds; self signed receipts and a post hoc declaration were insufficient. Inconsistent statements about the donor and absence of the donor's tax filings or other corroboration undermined credibility, leading to rejection of the gift claim and endorsement of the unexplained cash balance being taxed as income.
Treatment of a negative cash balance as income from unexplained sources was upheld because the taxpayer failed to prove that alleged cash gifts had a verifiable donor source. The court applied the principle that cash gifts require independent evidence of the donor's capacity and source of funds; self signed receipts and a post hoc declaration were insufficient. Inconsistent statements about the donor and absence of the donor's tax filings or other corroboration undermined credibility, leading to rejection of the gift claim and endorsement of the unexplained cash balance being taxed as income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.