Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
Disclosure of income detected during a survey that is recorded in books, included in the return and accepted in assessment negates the foundation for imposing a penalty under section 271(1)(c); the tribunal concluded there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars where the assessing officer did not treat the amounts as unexplained credits or make separate additions and only made limited disallowances, and therefore deletion of the penalty was upheld as a matter of law and fact.
Disclosure of income detected during a survey that is recorded in books, included in the return and accepted in assessment negates the foundation for imposing a penalty under section 271(1)(c); the tribunal concluded there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars where the assessing officer did not treat the amounts as unexplained credits or make separate additions and only made limited disallowances, and therefore deletion of the penalty was upheld as a matter of law and fact.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.