Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Disclosure of income detected during a survey that is recorded in books, included in the return and accepted in assessment negates the foundation for imposing a penalty under section 271(1)(c); the tribunal concluded there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars where the assessing officer did not treat the amounts as unexplained credits or make separate additions and only made limited disallowances, and therefore deletion of the penalty was upheld as a matter of law and fact.
Disclosure of income detected during a survey that is recorded in books, included in the return and accepted in assessment negates the foundation for imposing a penalty under section 271(1)(c); the tribunal concluded there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars where the assessing officer did not treat the amounts as unexplained credits or make separate additions and only made limited disallowances, and therefore deletion of the penalty was upheld as a matter of law and fact.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.