CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
The article analyses an appellate tribunal decision rejecting a unilateral loan write off to a wholly owned subsidiary as a deductible bad debt or business loss, applying transfer pricing principles and surrounding circumstance tests to sustain a transfer pricing adjustment and disallow the write off for lack of commercial substance. It finds weighted R&D deduction unavailable for want of mandatory administrative concurrence, but accepts the same expenditures as ordinary business expenditure. An ad hoc apportionment denying an industrial undertaking deduction was deleted under the consistency principle. Imputed interest on interest free advances was deleted on proof of interest free funds.
The article analyses an appellate tribunal decision rejecting a unilateral loan write off to a wholly owned subsidiary as a deductible bad debt or business loss, applying transfer pricing principles and surrounding circumstance tests to sustain a transfer pricing adjustment and disallow the write off for lack of commercial substance. It finds weighted R&D deduction unavailable for want of mandatory administrative concurrence, but accepts the same expenditures as ordinary business expenditure. An ad hoc apportionment denying an industrial undertaking deduction was deleted under the consistency principle. Imputed interest on interest free advances was deleted on proof of interest free funds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.