Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Transfer pricing comparability was addressed by excluding Unik Techno Systems Pvt. Ltd. as a valid comparable because functional dissimilarity (manufacturer of battery-production machines versus assessee's activities) rendered it unsuitable; the AO/TPO is directed to recompute ALP without that entity. Separately, the appellate body admitted fresh grounds contending that an excise duty exemption may constitute a non taxable capital receipt and remitted that substantive issue to the assessing officer for factual verification of scheme intent, eligibility and amounts, treatment under normal provisions and AMT, and for fresh decision after affording the assessee opportunity to be heard.
Transfer pricing comparability was addressed by excluding Unik Techno Systems Pvt. Ltd. as a valid comparable because functional dissimilarity (manufacturer of battery-production machines versus assessee's activities) rendered it unsuitable; the AO/TPO is directed to recompute ALP without that entity. Separately, the appellate body admitted fresh grounds contending that an excise duty exemption may constitute a non taxable capital receipt and remitted that substantive issue to the assessing officer for factual verification of scheme intent, eligibility and amounts, treatment under normal provisions and AMT, and for fresh decision after affording the assessee opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
