Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Reassessment initiated after the three-year period required approval from the higher authorities specified by section 151(2); approval recorded from a Principal Commissioner did not satisfy that statutory requirement, so the notice under section 148 and the reassessment order under section 147 read with section 144 were invalid and quashed. Consequential penalty orders founded on the quashed reassessment were also held invalid and quashed. The Tribunal did not decide the remaining merits-based grounds of appeal.
Reassessment initiated after the three-year period required approval from the higher authorities specified by section 151(2); approval recorded from a Principal Commissioner did not satisfy that statutory requirement, so the notice under section 148 and the reassessment order under section 147 read with section 144 were invalid and quashed. Consequential penalty orders founded on the quashed reassessment were also held invalid and quashed. The Tribunal did not decide the remaining merits-based grounds of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
