Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Where an assessing officer treated an amount shown as outstanding in the assessee's balance-sheet as unexplained income, the Tribunal accepted that bank account statements and TDS challans (including TDS payment with interest and late fee) evidencing subsequent payment sufficiently established the outstanding liability; the sale deeds' recital of full receipt without recording mode of payment did not override documentary banking evidence. On that basis the Tribunal held the Section 69A addition unsustainable and deleted the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal for the relevant assessment year.
Where an assessing officer treated an amount shown as outstanding in the assessee's balance-sheet as unexplained income, the Tribunal accepted that bank account statements and TDS challans (including TDS payment with interest and late fee) evidencing subsequent payment sufficiently established the outstanding liability; the sale deeds' recital of full receipt without recording mode of payment did not override documentary banking evidence. On that basis the Tribunal held the Section 69A addition unsustainable and deleted the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal for the relevant assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.