Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Unexplained money under Section 69A was considered: Tribunal held that where amounts are withdrawn from disclosed bank accounts and the assessee furnishes books, vouchers and utilisation records which the Assessing Officer does not specifically discredit, the deeming provision cannot be invoked and addition is deleted. Separately, an ad hoc 5% disallowance of expenditure was set aside because, after remand production of cash books and supporting vouchers, no targeted rejection or cogent material demonstrated unverifiable or excessive expenditure, so blanket percentage disallowance was impermissible.
Unexplained money under Section 69A was considered: Tribunal held that where amounts are withdrawn from disclosed bank accounts and the assessee furnishes books, vouchers and utilisation records which the Assessing Officer does not specifically discredit, the deeming provision cannot be invoked and addition is deleted. Separately, an ad hoc 5% disallowance of expenditure was set aside because, after remand production of cash books and supporting vouchers, no targeted rejection or cogent material demonstrated unverifiable or excessive expenditure, so blanket percentage disallowance was impermissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.