Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5001 to 5020 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee, an SPV executing a DBOT highway concession, capitalised project costs as intangible assets and claimed depreciation; the AO disallowed depreciation relying on ownership as determinative but allowed amortisation. The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal applied earlier Tribunal and Special Bench precedents holding that concession assets may attract depreciation despite contractual non ownership, and therefore allowed depreciation. The Tribunal upheld that application of binding precedents and dismissed revenue's appeal for the assessment year, sustaining the Commissioner (Appeals) deletion of the disallowance and permitting depreciation in lieu of the AO's approach.
Assessee, an SPV executing a DBOT highway concession, capitalised project costs as intangible assets and claimed depreciation; the AO disallowed depreciation relying on ownership as determinative but allowed amortisation. The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal applied earlier Tribunal and Special Bench precedents holding that concession assets may attract depreciation despite contractual non ownership, and therefore allowed depreciation. The Tribunal upheld that application of binding precedents and dismissed revenue's appeal for the assessment year, sustaining the Commissioner (Appeals) deletion of the disallowance and permitting depreciation in lieu of the AO's approach.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
