Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
The note addresses imposition of penalty for excess claim of speculation loss where the error arose from consolidation in a revised return by the taxpayer's tax consultant. It emphasises that absence of mens rea to evade tax and evidence of an inadvertent clerical mistake disentitle Revenue from levying penalty under the provision; the assessing officer therefore erred in invoking penalty. The operative legal point is that penalties for furnishing inaccurate particulars require deliberate or mala fide conduct, and mistakes attributable to a tax agent without proof of intent do not attract sanction.
The note addresses imposition of penalty for excess claim of speculation loss where the error arose from consolidation in a revised return by the taxpayer's tax consultant. It emphasises that absence of mens rea to evade tax and evidence of an inadvertent clerical mistake disentitle Revenue from levying penalty under the provision; the assessing officer therefore erred in invoking penalty. The operative legal point is that penalties for furnishing inaccurate particulars require deliberate or mala fide conduct, and mistakes attributable to a tax agent without proof of intent do not attract sanction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
