International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to...
Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment of fines.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to contain undeclared memory cards concealed within packaging; on that basis the goods were held liable to confiscation for being unreported, concealed and in excess of the entry, and the confiscation was sustained. Because the invoice and bill of entry described different goods, the declared transaction value was rejected and assessable value re-determined under valuation rules, with differential duty confirmed. Findings that another IEC was used and that nature, quantity and value were misdeclared supported imposition of the mandatory penalty for suppression/collusion. Redemption on payment of specified fines was upheld and opportunity for personal hearing was held adequate.
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to contain undeclared memory cards concealed within packaging; on that basis the goods were held liable to confiscation for being unreported, concealed and in excess of the entry, and the confiscation was sustained. Because the invoice and bill of entry described different goods, the declared transaction value was rejected and assessable value re-determined under valuation rules, with differential duty confirmed. Findings that another IEC was used and that nature, quantity and value were misdeclared supported imposition of the mandatory penalty for suppression/collusion. Redemption on payment of specified fines was upheld and opportunity for personal hearing was held adequate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
