Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defec...
Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment applicati...
Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of mate...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6381 to 6400 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to...
Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment of fines.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to contain undeclared memory cards concealed within packaging; on that basis the goods were held liable to confiscation for being unreported, concealed and in excess of the entry, and the confiscation was sustained. Because the invoice and bill of entry described different goods, the declared transaction value was rejected and assessable value re-determined under valuation rules, with differential duty confirmed. Findings that another IEC was used and that nature, quantity and value were misdeclared supported imposition of the mandatory penalty for suppression/collusion. Redemption on payment of specified fines was upheld and opportunity for personal hearing was held adequate.
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to contain undeclared memory cards concealed within packaging; on that basis the goods were held liable to confiscation for being unreported, concealed and in excess of the entry, and the confiscation was sustained. Because the invoice and bill of entry described different goods, the declared transaction value was rejected and assessable value re-determined under valuation rules, with differential duty confirmed. Findings that another IEC was used and that nature, quantity and value were misdeclared supported imposition of the mandatory penalty for suppression/collusion. Redemption on payment of specified fines was upheld and opportunity for personal hearing was held adequate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
