Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6121 to 6140 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to...
Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment of fines.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to contain undeclared memory cards concealed within packaging; on that basis the goods were held liable to confiscation for being unreported, concealed and in excess of the entry, and the confiscation was sustained. Because the invoice and bill of entry described different goods, the declared transaction value was rejected and assessable value re-determined under valuation rules, with differential duty confirmed. Findings that another IEC was used and that nature, quantity and value were misdeclared supported imposition of the mandatory penalty for suppression/collusion. Redemption on payment of specified fines was upheld and opportunity for personal hearing was held adequate.
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to contain undeclared memory cards concealed within packaging; on that basis the goods were held liable to confiscation for being unreported, concealed and in excess of the entry, and the confiscation was sustained. Because the invoice and bill of entry described different goods, the declared transaction value was rejected and assessable value re-determined under valuation rules, with differential duty confirmed. Findings that another IEC was used and that nature, quantity and value were misdeclared supported imposition of the mandatory penalty for suppression/collusion. Redemption on payment of specified fines was upheld and opportunity for personal hearing was held adequate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
