Deductibility for charitable donations affirmed where payments to approved relief funds, even if CSR-driven, qualify under the donation deduction sche...
Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5321 to 5340 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to...
Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment of fines.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to contain undeclared memory cards concealed within packaging; on that basis the goods were held liable to confiscation for being unreported, concealed and in excess of the entry, and the confiscation was sustained. Because the invoice and bill of entry described different goods, the declared transaction value was rejected and assessable value re-determined under valuation rules, with differential duty confirmed. Findings that another IEC was used and that nature, quantity and value were misdeclared supported imposition of the mandatory penalty for suppression/collusion. Redemption on payment of specified fines was upheld and opportunity for personal hearing was held adequate.
Imported consignments declared as metal clips were found to contain undeclared memory cards concealed within packaging; on that basis the goods were held liable to confiscation for being unreported, concealed and in excess of the entry, and the confiscation was sustained. Because the invoice and bill of entry described different goods, the declared transaction value was rejected and assessable value re-determined under valuation rules, with differential duty confirmed. Findings that another IEC was used and that nature, quantity and value were misdeclared supported imposition of the mandatory penalty for suppression/collusion. Redemption on payment of specified fines was upheld and opportunity for personal hearing was held adequate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
